Neon Nettle
© 2020 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2020 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

NY Times And WaPo Change Tune: Trump Supporters Deserve 'Respect'

Executive editors admit the publications 'have to do better'

 on 29th December 2019 @ 8.00pm
editors says outlets should  respect  and not be  dismissive  towards supporters of trump © press
Editors says outlets should 'respect' and not be 'dismissive' towards supporters of Trump

In what seemed to be drastic U-turn on the media's anti-Trump narrative, executive editors of the Washington Post and the New York Times admitted their outlets "have to do better" when reporting on President Donald Trump's supporters.

Both Washington Post executive editor Marty Baron and New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet agreed during Sunday's Meet the Press on NBC that the publications should "respect" and not be "dismissive" towards supporters of Trump. 

“I don’t want to be dismissive of people who support the president," Baron said.

"I think they’re owed our respect, and they certainly have mine,” he added.

“They feel that the so-called elites in Washington have not paid attention to them, that they don’t understand their lives," he continued.

both papers have been criticized for being biased towards trump and his supporters © press
Both papers have been criticized for being biased towards Trump and his supporters.

"They feel that the president is actually listening to them and addressing their concerns, and so they tend to believe him.”

Baquet agreed:

"We have to do a better job understanding why some people support Donald Trump," he added.

"I agree with Marty; we can’t dismiss everybody that supports Donald Trump. I think we have to get out in America much more than we do and talk to people.”

He continued:

"I think we cannot dismiss everybody who supported Donald Trump, and we just cannot dismiss them."

earlier this year  the former executive editor of the new york times blasted the paper for its news pages becoming  unmistakably anti trump © press
Earlier this year, the former executive editor of the New York Times blasted the paper for its news pages becoming 'unmistakably anti-Trump'

"First off, that’s not journalistically moral. It’s journalistically moral to reach out, understand the world, and to be read — that’s our job."

Both papers have been criticized for being biased towards Trump and his supporters.

Earlier this year, the former executive editor of the New York Times blasted the paper for its news pages becoming "unmistakably anti-Trump."

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, said the outlet had a financial incentive to bash Trump and that the imbalance was destroying its credibility.

“Though Baquet said publicly he didn’t want the Times to be the opposition party, his news pages were unmistakably anti-Trump,” Abramson states, adding that she believes the same is true of the Washington Post.

“Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.”

[RELATED] Actor Jim Carrey Describes Trump Supporters As 'Worse Than Animals

Share this post:
tags: Donald Trump | MAGA

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Whatfinger banner

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT