Pelosi Pushes New Laws to Allow Sitting Presidents to Be Indicted
Democratic House speaker accuses Trump of being 'abusive of the Constitution'
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has declared she seeking to pass new laws that will allow sitting Presidents to be indicted.
“The Founders could never suspect that a president would be so abusive of the Constitution of the United States,” California Democrat Pelosi claims.
Speaking during an interview with NPR, Speaker Pelosi says she has not changed her position on pursuing impeachment but is instead calling for a change to the law to restrict presidential power.
Pelosi says she wants to make it clear that sitting presidents can, in fact, be indicted.
“I do think that we will have to pass some laws that will have clarity for future presidents,” Pelosi told All Things Considered host Ari Shapiro and NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis on Friday.
"[A] president should be indicted, if he’s committed a wrongdoing — any president.
"There is nothing anyplace that says the president should not be indicted.
“That’s something cooked up by the president’s lawyers. That’s what that is.
"But so that people will feel ‘OK, well, if he — if he does something wrong, [he] should be able to be indicted.’”
The Democratic leader says the Department of Justice protocol - not to pursue any charges against an incumbent — should be changed.
Former special counsel Robert Mueller cited the same protocol when said he couldn’t charge President Trump with a crime no matter the outcome of his report
“The Founders could never suspect that a president would be so abusive of the Constitution of the United States, that the separation of powers would be irrelevant to him and that he would continue, any president would continue, to withhold facts from the Congress, which are part of the constitutional right of inquiry,” Pelosi continued.
The constitutional recourse for a lawbreaking president per the Constitution is impeachment.
Article II, Section 4 instructs that the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
But despite the growing chants among Democrats for an impeachment inquiry in the House, Pelosi has remained reluctant about recourse.
She fears it could alienate swing voters ahead of next year’s elections and imperil moderate Democrats who were critical to her party’s taking back the House last November.
Pelosi did not shift her position on impeachment and said Congress would continue to follow “the facts and the law.”
The speaker also said Congress should also clarify the limits of when a president can invoke a national emergency.
“The president should not be able to interpret the National Security Act as something that gives him free rein to do anything he wants by his personal declaration that something is an emergency,” Pelosi told NPR.
Pressure could be ramped up on Pelosi and Democrats to act further amid reports that Trump had an improper conversation with a foreign leader, which a whistleblower within the intelligence community then reported.
The conversation is reported to have been urging Ukraine to look into former Vice President Joe Biden — the current Democratic presidential front-runner who could be Trump’s 2020 foe — and his son Hunter Biden.
Trump has said the conversation was “totally appropriate.”
Pelosi called the whistleblower’s complaint “very alarming” and said, “this is in a different class in terms of [Trump’s] behavior.”
“This case has a national security piece to it that is very alarming.
"It is very alarming because the inspector general is appointed by President Trump.”
She said the law is clear that the information must be submitted to the intelligence committees in Congress.
“Right now they are breaking the law” by not providing that information, she said.
In a statement released after the NPR interview, Pelosi went even further, saying the reports raise “grave, urgent concerns for our national security” and that the president and his administration must conduct “our national security and foreign policy in the best interest of the American people, not the President’s personal interest.”
“If the President has done what has been alleged,” she said, “then he is stepping into a dangerous minefield with serious repercussions for his Administration and our democracy.”