Neon Nettle
© 2019 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2019 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

Google Insists Conservative Education Org Must Be Blocked Like Porn

Tech giants argues in court that PragerU should be restricted

 on 2nd September 2019 @ 1.00pm
google ceo sundar pichai testified before congress that his company doesn t censor conservatives © press
Google CEO Sundar Pichai testified before Congress that his company doesn't censor conservatives

Google has insisted in court that a conservative education organization must be blocked from its platforms in the same way as porn, according to reports.

The tech giant is defending its reasons for blocking PragerU in court after denying some viewers access to videos produced by the conservative group on Google-owned YouTube.

A lawyer representing PragerU in federal court says Google's decision to ban content from the educational org defies belief. 

"To suggest that PragerU's content is obscene, violent, hate speech is an absolute insult to the intelligence of the American public and people like yourself, who are willing to enter the important political dialogue," PragerU's lead attorney, Peter Obstler, told reporters and others at a press conference in Seattle last Tuesday.

Obstler spoke to reporters after both sides presented oral arguments in Prager University v. Google LLC before the Seattle-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

google has blocked content from dennis prager s conservative education org prageru © press
Google has blocked content from Dennis Prager's conservative education org PragerU

According to the Daily Signal, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, appointed by President Barack Obama, dismissed the lawsuit in March, ruling that Google does not have to treat those who use its services equally.  

The legal battle by the organization co-founded by commentator and talk radio host Dennis Prager began in October 2017.

Prager University, known as PragerU, filed a lawsuit against Google after YouTube placed more than 100 of its videos in "restricted" mode, flagging them as "dangerous" or "derogatory," according to a press release from PragerU. 

"'Restricted' means that families that have a filter to avoid pornography and violence cannot see that video," Prager told a Senate subcommittee in a July hearing

PragerU said in the press release that it filed the suit because Google and YouTube have restricted 10% of its video content and "maintains that the organization's videos have been restricted, not because they are explicit, vulgar or obscene in nature, or inappropriate for children in any way, but rather because they promote conservative ideas." 

The videos categorized as restricted cover a range of topics, including the Ten Commandments, tolerance, climate change, free speech, and fake news, and tend to be three to five minutes in length. 

Obstler said the organization, which focuses on teaching America's founding principles and institutions and has more than 2 million YouTube subscribers, is ready to take the case as far as the Supreme Court. 

"We will be back, but I am optimistic that we got a very fair hearing with three very able judges today," Obstler said.

"I believe they will do the right thing, and I believe that we will survive in federal court." 

prageru s attorney peter obstler says google s decision to block prageru defies belief © press
PragerU's attorney Peter Obstler says Google's decision to block PragerU defies belief

The Daily Signal asked Google for comment on the court case, but it declined to comment on the record.

Google's defenders argue that all PragerU videos are available to the 98% of YouTube users who haven't enabled the "restricted" mode. 

PragerU supporters counter that the remaining 2% number in the millions.

Supporters of Google's stance also argue that those on various parts of the political spectrum can point to examples where they believe YouTube treated their videos unfairly, usually because of the "restricted" mode created for more mature content.

Pete Wilson, a former U.S. senator and governor of California, also spoke at the press conference, saying he is hopeful that PragerU will prevail.

Wilson's law firm represents the organization. 

"My hope, at least my optimistic expectation ... is that this court may give us that second chance," Wilson said. 

Obstler said the case is vitally important because it is closely related to the First Amendment right of free speech. 

"Civil dialogue and civil discourse in an open way is the only thing that can keep our democracy going," Obstler said.

[RELATED] Former Google Engineer: They Want Trump to Lose in 2020 - 'That's Their Agenda'

Share this post:

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Whatfinger banner

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT