New York Times: Lawns are a Symbol of Racism
NYT says a well-kept lawn outside someone's home is 'problematic'
The New York Times has claimed in a recent report that a well-kept lawn outside a person's home is "problematic" because it is a symbol of racism.
In a seven-minute video "exposé," the NYT explains how lawn care is problematic, once viewed through the lens of social justice.
Narrator David Botti reveals how their origins are far from woke, as he reveals the "disturbing" history of American lawns.
Lawns are part of the “colonizing of America,” when the “pristine wilderness” of the landscape was transformed into “identical rows of manicured nature,” according to Botti.
As the footage zooms in on a painting of George Washington in a field to highlight men cutting the grass with scythes, Botti says, “These lawns come on the backs of slaves.”
“It’s grueling, endless work.”
“By the 1870s we also see American culture slowly start to embrace lawns for the privileged masses,” he states.
According to Breitbart, the video explains that the perfect lawn is associated with being a model citizen, how the first sprinkler was invented in 1871, and about the advent of “so-called trade cards” that “advertised the hell out of lawn and garden products.”
The Times also refers to the work of historian Ted Steinberg, who calls lawns the “outdoor expression of ’50s conformism.”
To drive home the point, he inserts vintage footage of two women being interviewed in their yards talking about how they moved to their communities to live exclusively near other white people.
A professor at George Washington University Law School has released a report claiming that #milk is a "racist tool" that is used by "White supremacists."— Neon Nettle (@NeonNettle) September 5, 2018
READ MORE: https://t.co/jqPOeMR5e3 #MAGA #liberals
Neither of them says anything about desiring, having, or maintaining a lawn.
The Times refers readers to two books: Steinberg’s American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn and The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession, by Virginia Scott Jenkins.
Jenkins’ book concludes that lawns in America are status symbols, and their popularity grew due to promotion by the garden and golf industries and the federal government’s United States Department of Agriculture.
She also said that lawns “are a symbol of man’s control of, or superiority, over his environment.”
Both Steinberg and Jenkins make the case that lawns are harming the environment.
“Steinberg makes a convincing case that ‘turf hysteria' and the 'giant chemical orgy’ of modern lawn care have led to water pollution and the shunning of native plants,” one review of his book says.
The Times links to a 2005 report from NASA that said there are more lawns in the United States than irrigated cornfields and attempting to quantify how much water is used keeping lawns alive in many areas of the country.
The article also includes the Times’ vintage reporting on President Theodore Roosevelt mowing his lawn in 1914.
“Col. Roosevelt refused to discuss politics today,” the article on the Times front page said and is shown in the video.
“He got in a lot of good, vigorous exercise.
"For three hours he pushed a lawnmower out on the lawns at Sagamore Hill.
"And the exercise did not seem to tire him at all.”
The article and video make it clear how lawns — and the Times’ reporting — have changed over the course of history.