Neon Nettle
© 2022 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2022 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

New Jersey Democrats Push Bill to Keep Trump’s Name off 2020 State Ballot

NJ lawmakers threaten to keep president off the ballot unless he makes his taxes public

 on 23rd February 2019 @ 9.00pm
new jersey lawmakers are threatening to keep president trump s name off the state ballot in 2020 © press
New Jersey lawmakers are threatening to keep President Trump's name off the state ballot in 2020

A new bill being pushed by mostly Democratic lawmakers in New Jersey aims to keep President Donald Trump and other politicians’ names off the state ballot in 2020 unless they make their taxes public.

On Thursday, the state Senate approved a bill that would leave off the names of candidates in the presidential election if they are unwilling to release their tax returns to the public, according to

In 2017, a similar effort was devised, but then-Republican Gov. Chris Christie squashed Democrats’ hopes by vetoing the bill, describing it as a “transparent political stunt.”

Should the Assembly and Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy approve the bill, New Jersey would become the first state to enact such a measure.

At least 30 other states have made similar attempts to pass such legislation, but none have become law, according to the Courier Post.

former governor chris christie previously vetoed similar attempts by democrats © press
Former Governor Chris Christie previously vetoed similar attempts by Democrats

According to the Daily Caller, these actions, primarily under the direction of Democratic lawmakers, were sparked after then-candidate Trump turned down requests to publish his tax returns, hindering the public’s ability to glimpse his personal finances.

“It is so obvious with this president that had voters known some of what seem to be his business interests, he may not have been elected president,” Democratic state Sen. Loretta Weinberg, a sponsor of the legislation, told the Courier Post.

The law raises questions about whether it violates aspects of the Constitution.

Proponents of the bill, like Republican state Sen. Joe Pennacchio, argue states have the right to regulate their ballot requirements under the Constitution.

“It sends a message that states can tamper with the ballot in any way that pleases the majority party politically,” he said in a statement.

"Taxpayers will be the ones who pay the price when this ends up in court," he added.

democratic gov  phil murphy needs to approve the bill now it has passed the state senate © press
Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy needs to approve the bill now it has passed the state Senate

Pennacchio says the bill should instead be targeted at all elected officials, rather than merely spotlighting the presidency.

“If this really is about making sure voters are well-informed, then common sense dictates that S-119 should apply to all of us,” Pennacchio continued.

Critics say such a measure would be struck down by the courts and could lead to more demands on candidates in the future.

“It’s just political pandering,” said John Carbone, an attorney specializing in election law at the Ridgewood firm Carbone & Faasse.

“They can impose no requirements for a candidate for federal office, let alone president,” Carbone added, referring to Democratic state lawmakers.

“They’re thinking like Alabama Democrats during the Civil War: What can we do to get Lincoln?”

[RELATED] Nancy Pelosi Tells Europe She Has Equal Power; Trump is Not in Charge

Steve Quayle Neon Nettle telegram

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.


Subscribe to our mailing list

Follow Neon Nettle