Hillary Clinton's Actions In Libya Started The EU Migrant Crisis, Professor Says
The for US Secretary of State urged Europe to curb immigration
As we reported today, Hillary Clinton's heavy criticism of the growing populist movement in Europe may be a result of her own doing.
The for US Secretary of State urged Europe to curb immigration to combat the rise of so-called 'right-wing populism'.
But the political scientist, lecturer, and commentator Dr. Roberto Castaldi suggested that her role in Libya may have helped ignite the current migrant crisis we now seeing in Europe.
Dr. Roberto Castaldi has revealed his perspective in an interview with Sputnik:
Sputnik: Hillary Clinton has a long track record of supporting immigration. Why do you think she's changed her rhetoric now?
Roberto Castaldi: She has to justify why she lost the  election. That's the same thing other former leaders of the center-left in Europe are doing when they suggest that we need a radical change in migration policy. But what we need is good management of migration policy at the European level.
What we have seen in the US is very different from what we have in Europe. [Here,] some countries were overwhelmed by the influx of migrants in 2015, while others have been wholly spared the problem.
And there has not been enough European solidarity, because the European Union does not have the power and the competencies regarding migration policy…
Remember Gaddafi? Hillary Clinton Shamed for Libya Intervention as She Schools EU on Migrant Crisis
Also, we see the differences between various policies in different [European] countries. Some countries can integrate migrants, to find them jobs and to make them into a resource, while some countries are not.
And the need for legal ways to enter Europe is essential. What we see today, also in the public perception, is that people see migration as an unmanaged problem, because people can arrive in Europe only by illegal means.
Once they get there, they can ask for asylum, and we have to see whether they have the right to be treated as refugees or not.
What we need is to process those demands beforehand, and to create legal and secure ways to get into Europe for those who have the right – for refugees and asylum protection.
Sputnik: Some immigration experts are saying that Clinton seems to be trying to appease right-wing leaders in Europe. Why would she be doing this? What does she stand to gain from this, in your view?
Roberto Castaldi: On the one hand, many people in the West are afraid of right-wing extremists and think that the best way to cope with them is to get closer to their positions to appease the voters.
I don't think this is the case. What we've seen so far is that when a strong leader was willing and able to take on the challenge, he or she won. That was the case with Macron.
Traditional mainstream parties have tried to depict themselves as closer to the position of the right wing.
The result has been that the electorate did not increase their votes, but decreased them.
That was the case for instance in Bavaria with the Christian Social Union, or Germany with the Christian Democratic Union.
Sputnik: Many are critical of Clinton even touching on the topic of immigration, saying they remember 2011 when Clinton was a very vocal defender of the Libyan military intervention.
Many believe that this is one of the reasons we had the refugee crisis in Europe in the first place. Do you agree with this?
Roberto Castaldi: Absolutely, but that was not only Clinton's fault because France and the UK were at the forefront of the intervention in Libya.
And the [consequences] of these were paid mainly by Italy and Greece.
The problem is that we have not been able to cope with the consequences not just of the Libyan intervention, but of the fact that all of the Middle East and North Africa is in turmoil.
We have a very difficult situation on the ground in many countries, and this is ultimately due to the shift in the American strategic focus in the last 15 years.
Roberto Castaldi: In some countries, they were taken up in a very significant way. In some others, they weren't.
But overall I think they are not the main issue today in Europe, [partly] because Clinton is no longer in a position to set the tone or the political debate either in the US or in Europe.