Neon Nettle
© 2019 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2019 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

Democrats File Lawsuit to Block Matthew Whitaker's Appointment as Acting AG

Democratic senators file suit in federal court to stop Trump's appointee

 on 20th November 2018 @ 1.00am
democrats have filed a lawsuit in federal court to block whitaker s appointment as acting ag © press
Democrats have filed a lawsuit in federal court to block Whitaker's appointment as acting AG

Three prominent Democrats have filed a lawsuit in federal court to block Matthew Whitaker's appointment as acting attorney general.

The Democratic senators are suing to challenge the constitutionality of Whitaker being appointed as acting AG by President Trump.

Whitaker was chosen to lead the Justice Department by Donald Trump after Attorney General Jeff Sessions 'resigned' from the role earlier this month.

On Monday, Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, and Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Whitaker.

whitaker was appointed acting ag by trump after jeff sessions  retired  as attorney general © press
Whitaker was appointed acting AG by Trump after Jeff Sessions 'retired' as Attorney General

According to Fox News, all three Dems issued fiery statements.

“Installing Matthew Whitaker so flagrantly defies constitutional law that any viewer of School House Rock would recognize it. Americans prize a system of checks and balances, which President Trump’s dictatorial appointment betrays,” Blumenthal said.

"The stakes are too high to allow the president to install an unconfirmed lackey to lead the Department of Justice – a lackey whose stated purpose, apparently, is undermining a major investigation into the president,” Whitehouse said.

“Donald Trump cannot subvert the Constitution to protect himself and evade accountability,” Hirono said.

The senators argue that Whitaker’s appointment is in violation of the Constitution’s appointments clause.

They ask the federal court to declare Whitaker’s appointment unconstitutional and block him from carrying out duties.

But the Justice Department maintains that the appointment is legal. DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said Monday the appointment is “lawful” and comports with the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, past Department of Justice opinions and past actions of Republican and Democratic presidents.

“There are over 160 instances in American history in which non-Senate confirmed persons performed, on a temporary basis, the duties of a Senate-confirmed position,” Kupec said.

“To suggest otherwise is to ignore centuries of practice and precedent.”

richard blumenthal claims that  installing matthew whitaker so flagrantly defies constitutional law © press
Richard Blumenthal claims that 'installing Matthew Whitaker so flagrantly defies constitutional law'

Last week, the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion supporting Whitaker’s appointment.

“This office previously had advised that the president could designate a senior Department of Justice official, such as Mr. Whitaker, as Acting Attorney General,” the OLC said, noting that Whitaker has been serving at the Justice Department “at a sufficiently senior pay level for over a year.”

Others have filed lawsuits over the Whitaker appointment, including the state of Maryland.

For more than a year, Trump repeatedly lambasted Sessions over his recusal from the Russia investigation, saying he wouldn’t have installed him as the country’s top law enforcement officer had he known his attorney general would recuse himself from the Russia probe.

Democrats have expressed alarm about what the change at DOJ could mean for the Russia probe, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., saying, “protecting Mueller and his investigation is paramount.”

Other Democrats have called on Whitaker to remove himself from the Russia probe because of his past comments expressing skepticism about the scope and appropriateness of the probe.

The Democratic senators are being represented by two non-profit law firms in the case: Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center.

Share this post:
tags: Democrats | Lawsuit

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Whatfinger banner

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT