Multiple Discrepancies Found In Senator Feinstein's Ford Letter, Document Expert
This time, it looks like a democrat plot to remove Kavanaugh has been uncovered.
© press
Yet another Internet sleuth has sent out a series of Tweets taking apart the so-called 'official' to the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault 40 years ago.
As common with the internet, there are many people are willing to provide their professional services free and without bias.
This time, it looks like a democrat plot to remove Kavanaugh has been uncovered.
1) I believe the letter from Dr. Ford was written by a third party.#ConfirmKavanaughNow pic.twitter.com/qbJPviP75p
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
17) My professional opinion is based on 2.5 years of being responsible for constituent letters from Congress. Meaning, I have scanned, read, reviewed, routed and responded to hundreds of them.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
18) I have been a professional writer for 30 years.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
21) First of all, as has already been pointed out, Dr. Ford’s letter does not read like a very educated person wrote it. https://t.co/WN8kGCUMtk
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
21) First of all, as has already been pointed out, Dr. Ford’s letter does not read like a very educated person wrote it. https://t.co/WN8kGCUMtk
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
23) The first clue is that she capitalized “high school.” In this sentence, it doesn’t need to be capitalized. pic.twitter.com/VeDewwB4SV
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
23) The first clue is that she capitalized “high school.” In this sentence, it doesn’t need to be capitalized. pic.twitter.com/VeDewwB4SV
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
25) The second clue is the first line of the second paragraph. As others have pointed out, the font size is not consistent; is this a sloppy printout she is sending on a letter of historic importance? pic.twitter.com/yyQUiBm6Mg
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
25) The second clue is the first line of the second paragraph. As others have pointed out, the font size is not consistent; is this a sloppy printout she is sending on a letter of historic importance? pic.twitter.com/yyQUiBm6Mg
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
26) Also noteworthy is that she says “in the early 1980’s.” The grammar here is wrong - you would write “1980s” without the apostrophe. pic.twitter.com/WbJTVnlUZd
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
27) Further, in the letters I have reviewed, emotional constituents are usually hyper-specific about their complaints — never vague. Logically, that is why they are writing to Congress: to remedy a wrong that is clear to them, but not others.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
So “early 1980’s” is not normal. pic.twitter.com/sOYc4sPf2G
27) Further, in the letters I have reviewed, emotional constituents are usually hyper-specific about their complaints — never vague. Logically, that is why they are writing to Congress: to remedy a wrong that is clear to them, but not others.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
So “early 1980’s” is not normal. pic.twitter.com/sOYc4sPf2G
30) “They” locked the door. Who is “they?” Which one? Both together? pic.twitter.com/HtZJWe56FH
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of Tweets that have pulled apart the letter from Senator Feinstein, not only is it full of flaws but Dr. ‘Dossy’ Blumenthal thinks the letter was written by a third party
Neon Nettle also reported yesterday that the font in the second paragraph does not match with the rest of the letter.
