© 2018 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Write For Us T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2018 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

CDC Caught Hiding Deadly Side Effects of Vaccines

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been exposed

By: Daniel Newton  |@NeonNettle
 on 10th May 2018 @ 4.04pm
the centers for disease control and prevention  cdc  has been exposed by senior scientists © press
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been exposed by senior scientists

CDC has been caught using a variety of tricks, including manipulating data and employing underhand research practices in order to hide the deadly side effects of vaccines.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been exposed by senior scientists and vaccine critics for their unethical modus operandi, as questionable practices have become “the norm and not the rare exception.” 

According to an article in the Annals of Clinical Pathology, CDC has been caught actively suppressing of important research findings on vaccines including its Universal Varicella Vaccination Program.

According to an independent computer scientist, there is a “collusion” between CDC and its local public health partner to center "undesirable" chickenpox outcomes from the public.

cdc caught hiding deadly side effects of vaccines © press

One virus, two diseases...

Natural chickenpox (caused by the varicella-zoster virus) used to be a normal childhood experience prior to the 1990's, the disease actually helped with long-term immunity.

Back in 1995, the CDC added the chickenpox vaccine to the childhood vaccine schedule for 12- to 15-month-old children.

According to Infowars: In 2006, acknowledging the problem of waning vaccine effectiveness, it indicated that four- to six-year-old children needed to get a second (booster) shot.

READ MORE: CDC Doctor: Catastrophic Flu Shot Has 'Triggered A Deadly Flu Outbreak'

Following natural chickenpox infection, the virus remains latent in the body.

If reactivated later in life (usually in immunocompromised adults), the virus resurfaces in the form of shingles (herpes zoster or HZ).

Before the introduction of the vaccine, the high prevalence of natural chickenpox in communities served to hold shingles in check for most adults by regularly boosting a type of immunity called cell-mediated immunity.

In fact, a 2002 study showed that exposure to natural chickenpox in adults living with children “was highly protective against [herpes] zoster.”

Those authors cautioned that mass chickenpox vaccination was likely to cause a major shingles epidemic and predicted that shingles would affect “more than 50% of those aged 10-44 years at the introduction of vaccination.”

Before and after the introduction of the vaccine, researchers also warned of the vaccine’s potential to shift the average age of chickenpox infection upward—a problematic scenario is given that chickenpox is more severe in adults—while shifting downward the average age at which shingles occurs.

From predictions to reality

The Annals author was hired as a research analyst in 1995 by the Los Angeles Department of Health through the CDC-funded Varicella Active Surveillance Project.

For reasons specific to the project’s self-contained geographic locality, the project benefited from unusually high-quality data and “uninterrupted and stable data collection.”

Thus, the research analyst found himself ideally positioned to monitor the rollout of the chickenpox vaccination program from its inception and assess its outcomes—both positive and negative.

Initially, his sole mandate was to analyze varicella data. In 2000, however, after anecdotal reports began trickling in from school nurses about “unexplainable increases in the number of cases of HZ…among school-aged children,” the analyst persuaded the CDC to add active surveillance of shingles to his duties. In short order, this dual surveillance effort revealed two clearly negative consequences of the varicella vaccination program:

Widespread chickenpox vaccination had “accelerated the recurrence of shingles in children who had had natural chickenpox” to rates higher than those published “in any historical study.”

Previously, “such high HZ incidence rates were…associated with older adults, not children.”

The mass varicella vaccination program also had “increased the likelihood of shingles recurrence in adults.”

Neither finding was palatable to the public health agencies eager to publicize their vaccination program as an unmitigated success.

Obfuscation and malfeasance

From this point, until the analyst quit in disgust in 2002, the CDC either sat on or out-and-out forbade publication of any studies “suggesting negative findings or deleterious effects,” engaging in at least 23 distinct actions “contributing to obfuscation and malfeasance.”

READ MORE: Doctor Blows Whistle on Flu Shot: 'It’s Designed to Spread Cancer'

In one nonsensical attempt to “bury” the findings, the project investigators “simply and spuriously argued that the [surveillance project] did not provide a suitable platform for which to study HZ incidence rates.”

When the analyst refuted this argument, the agencies sought to statistically mask the unwanted findings.

For example, they improperly averaged shingles rates across the two very different subgroups of children (vaccine recipients and children who had previously had natural chickenpox) to hide the spike in shingles in the second group.

The CDC and local health department also went after the research analyst, both before and after his employment with them. Actions included:

Directing him “not to pursue further analysis of trends in HZ cases”
Denying him permission to contact individuals who had reported a second recurrence of shingles within a year of their first reported case
Attempting to discredit him through ad hominem attacks
After his resignation, serving notice “to ‘cease and desist’ publication in a medical journal when he sought to objectively publish all of the data and results” and pressuring journal editors to postpone publication.
Case reports likewise refer to “vaccine-strain zoster severe enough to cause neurological complications such as meningitis or encephalitis” in healthy children.

Hollow promises
More than two decades into universal chickenpox vaccination in the U.S., the program’s early promises ring hollow.

Instead, the Annals author makes a compelling case that the program has resulted in a “fabricated cycle of disease and treatment” that has a substantial health care cost burden and is “causing distress” to vaccine recipients—and non-recipients—of all ages.

Elsewhere, the author quoted a parent whose daughter received the varicella vaccine at age four (having never had natural chickenpox) and then had recurrent and painful episodes of shingles at ages 13 and 16; the parent expressed regret for “a dangerous vaccine with awful side effects that stay with you for a lifetime…far worse than chickenpox in one’s youth.”

Case reports likewise refer to “vaccine-strain zoster severe enough to cause neurological complications such as meningitis or encephalitis” in healthy children.

Recently, Italian scientists suggested that routine varicella vaccination programs may have “perverse public health implications” due to the “intrinsically antagonistic” dynamic between chickenpox and shingles.

Likewise, an agency—the CDC—that is in charge of promoting vaccine uptake while being tasked with vaccine safety at the same time has an inherent conflict of interest that does not serve the public.

Over a decade ago, a Nature editorial discussed parents’ declining confidence in vaccine safety and concluded that there was a “strong case” to be made for establishing “a well-resourced independent national agency that commands the trust of both the government and the public in matters of health protection.”

Johns Hopkins University researchers similarly called for an independent National Vaccine Safety Board separate from the CDC or any branch of government in order to “ensure optimal vaccine safety.” It’s high time to follow through on those vital recommendations.

Share this post:

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.


Subscribe to our mailing list

Whatfinger banner

Follow NN