Neon Nettle
© 2022 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2022 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

Juror Who Acquitted Sussmann: ‘Lying to FBI’ No Big Deal

'There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI'

 on 1st June 2022 @ 2.00pm
 i don   t think it should have been prosecuted   the juror said © press
'I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,' the juror said

A juror in the trial of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who was acquitted Tuesday, said she did not believe the case should have been prosecuted because lying to the FBI was not a big deal.

“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she reportedly said, according to Jeff Mordock, White House reporter for the Washington Times.

“There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

The case was the most high-profile prosecution undertaken by Special Counsel John H. Durham, who is investigating the origins of the “Russia collusion” conspiracy theory.

sussmann was widely considered by legal observers to have been proven guilty © press
Sussmann was widely considered by legal observers to have been proven guilty

The trial saw testimony that tied Hillary Clinton directly to the hoax.

Sussmann was widely considered by legal observers to have been proven guilty.

The testimony of FBI agents and a text message that suggested he claimed to be acting as a concerned citizen rather than a Clinton campaign lawyer when he tipped off the agency about supposed collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump and the Russian government via Alfa Bank — a claim that was later debunked.

Last week, former White House national security official Kash Patel said the only strategy the defense had left in the Michael Sussmann trial was “jury nullification,” which would urge the jury to bypass the evidence presented.

As Neon Nettle reported:

During an interview with Breitbart, a day after the prosecution rested its case, Patel weighed in on the last piece of evidence, which was conducted by Patel with Sussmann four years ago.

Sussmann had told the committee that he was working for a client when he went to the FBI claiming that computer evidence showed then-candidate Donald Trump was tied to the Russian government via Alfa Bank.

the case was the most high profile prosecution undertaken by special counsel john h  durham © press
The case was the most high-profile prosecution undertaken by Special Counsel John H. Durham

The juror’s attitude hinted at nullification, and contrasted sharply with the approach taken by a federal judge in the same D.C. jurisdiction when it came to former Trump aide Michael Flynn, who was charged with the same crime.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan would not let the case go, even after new evidence emerged that convinced prosecutors to withdraw the charge.

Ultimately, President Trump had to pardon Flynn to extricate him from what observers considered a wrongful prosecution.

As Neon Nettle reported last month:

Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified that Hillary Clinton approved the dissemination of materials alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank to the press.

The alleged approval came despite campaign officials not being “totally confident” in the legitimacy of the data.

[RELATED] Hillary Clinton Crimes 'Chart' Covered Up By Obama FBI, FOIA Docs Reveal

Share:
Steve Quayle Neon Nettle telegram

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT
on Nettle">BOOKMARK US NEXT on Nettle">BOOKMARK US NEXT on Nettle">BOOKMARK US NEXT