Twitter Refuses to Ban Taliban: Terrorists Do NOT 'Glorify Violence'
Pressure mounts on social media giant as President Trump still banned from platform
© press
Pressure is mounting against American social media giant Twitter after the platform has refused to ban members of the Taliban from its platform, arguing the terrorist group doesn't "glorify violence" or violate spam rules.
The news comes amid reports Twitter's rivals have banned the Taliban after it emerged the terrorists were using Big Tech apps such as Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram (all owned by Facebook) to coordinate the violent overthrowing of the Afghanistan government last week.
Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube have all shut down accounts that are related to, promote or praise the Taliban.
In a statement, Twitter said that it will "continue to proactively enforce our rules and review content that may violate Twitter rules, specifically policies against glorification of violence, platform manipulation, and spam."
However, the decision has prompted widespread outrage and more allegations of political bias as President Donald Trump still remains banned from Twitter.
The Big Tech giant used the justification to permanently ban Trump after the January 6 Capitol Riot, causing accusations of censorship from Trump supporters and conservatives.
© press
Twitter defended its decision to allow Taliban-related accounts to remain active, saying that people in Afghanistan are using the platform to seek help and refuge.
Facebook, which also has muzzled Trump, has had its ban on the Taliban in place for years because it considers it a "dangerous group."
This double standard drew the ire of Trump supporters and conservatives.
The two Taliban spokesmen, Suhail Shaehee and Zabihullah Mujahid have more than 351,000 and 310,000 Twitter followers, respectively.
Their accounts have been active for years.
On Tuesday, Rep. Doug Lamborn sent a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey expressing concerns about members of the Taliban being allowed to use the platform to get their message out.
"Why does Twitter allow two Taliban spokesmen to have a platform but restricts the First Amendment Rights of former President Trump?" he tweeted.
"It's past time to hold #BigTech accountable. #Taliban."
In his letter, Lamborn said it's clear that the Taliban falls under the "violent organization category."
"In my review of these accounts, I did not find a single fact check on any of their tweets, nor any warnings for false or misleading content," Lamborn wrote in his letter to Dorsey.
"These propaganda updates usually assert that the overthrow has been largely peaceful, despite reports to the contrary ...
"It is impossible to see how the accounts of Zabihullah Mujahid and Yousef Ahmandi do not violate your policies."
"Why on God's green Earth does the Taliban spokesman have an active Twitter account but not the former President of the United States?" asked Rep. Madison Cawthorn, a North Carolina Republican.
"Who's side is the AMERICA BASED Big-Tech companies on?" he added.
Why on God's green Earth does the Taliban spokesman have an active Twitter account but not the former President of the United States?
— Rep. Madison Cawthorn (@RepCawthorn) August 15, 2021
Who’s side is the AMERICA BASED Big-Tech companies on? https://t.co/wzQyzQ1lZX
"The Taliban Spokesman has a Twitter account without any problem," tweeted Rep. Claudia Tenney, a New York Republican.
"Meanwhile, President Trump is banned from the platform.
"Something is very wrong here."
Adrian Hilton, a conservative academic and lecturer on political philosophy in the UK, also pointed out the apparent double standards.
"Twitter banned Donald Trump for expressing support for rioters who stormed the US Capitol," he wrote.
"Twitter permitted the Taliban official spokesman to live-tweet Mujahideen terror, the acquisition of arms, storming the Afghanistan capital, and the occupation of the presidential palace."
During a Tuesday press conference in Kabul - which was broadcast and translated into English by Al Jazeera and posted on Twitter - a spokesperson was asked about freedom of speech.
"This question should be asked to those people who are claiming to be promoters of freedom of speech who do not allow publication of information," he replied.
"I can ask [the] Facebook company."
The Taliban spokesman's comments were greeted by virtual applause from Donald Trump Jr. on Twitter, who retweeted the 30-second video clip and said, "LOL ... Also not wrong."
© press
Over the weekend, the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was all but complete, after the U.S. spent two decades and billions of dollars attempting to prop up a democratic government friendly to the West.
The U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 ousted the Islamist militants from power, but they never left and returned to power after Afghan government forces completely capitulated.
After the Taliban blitzed across the country in recent days, the Western-backed government that has run the country for 20 years collapsed.
During the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan, the insurgents reportedly "married" girls as young as 12 and forced them into sex slavery as "spoils of war," and killed Afghan troops who tried to surrender.
It's not yet clear if the terrorists wiped their feet before walking on the red carpet rolled out for them in the presidential palace by Joe Biden.
