Neon Nettle
© 2021 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2021 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

Court Says Law Mandating Trans Pronoun Use 'Violates Free Speech'

California's Third District Court of Appeal upended SB 219

 on 20th July 2021 @ 11.00pm
the court stated the pronoun provision is a    content based restriction of speech © press
The court stated the pronoun provision is a “content-based restriction of speech

A provision in a state law passed mandating health care workers use transgender pronouns is a violation of free speech, a California appellate court ruled Friday.

California's Third District Court of Appeal upended SB 219, which forced nursing home workers to use transgender pronouns for patients.

According to California Family Council, violators of the law “could be charged with a misdemeanor and subject to punishment of a $1000 fine, or even up to one year in jail.”

LGBT site The Washington Blade reported:

The Court, in a unanimous 3-0 decision, struck down this key provision of the LGBTQ Long-Term Care Facility Residents’ Bill of Rights, created by SB 219 in 2017, authored by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and sponsored by Equality California. The Court upheld the provision in the law that requires nursing homes to place transgender patients in rooms that match their gender identity.

sb 219 sponsor democratic senator scott wiener the said decision  is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people © press
SB 219 sponsor Democratic Senator Scott Wiener the said decision 'is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people'

Below is a portion of the law, as per California Legislative Info:

Among other things, the bill would make it unlawful, except as specified, for any long-term care facility to take specified actions wholly or partially on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, including, among others, willfully and repeatedly failing to use a resident’s preferred name or pronouns after being clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns, or denying admission to a long-term care facility, transferring or refusing to transfer a resident within a facility or to another facility, or discharging or evicting a resident from a facility.

The court stated the pronoun provision is a “content-based restriction of speech that does not survive strict scrutiny” and “burdens speech more than is required.”

Justice Elena Duarte wrote:

“The pronoun provision at issue here tests the limits of the government’s authority to restrict pure speech that, while potentially offensive or harassing to the listener, does not necessarily create a hostile environment."

violators of the law    could be charged with a misdemeanor and subject to punishment of a  1000 fine © press
violators of the law “could be charged with a misdemeanor and subject to punishment of a $1000 fine'

The judge italicized “potentially” and “necessarily.”

Judge Duarte said that although refusing to use transgender pronouns “may be disrespectful, discourteous, and insulting,” but it allows others “to express an ideological disagreement with another person’s expressed gender identity.”

In 2017, Taking Offense challenged the law, according to California Family Council.

Llewellyn Law Office Attorney David Llewellyn brought the case “on behalf of several unnamed clients and is challenging the law as ‘unconstitutionally vague and overbroad,'” the site noted.

SB 219 sponsor Democratic Senator Scott Wiener the said decision “is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people,” adding that “misgendering” someone is “straight-up harassment.”

“The Court’s decision is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people. Deliberately misgendering a transgender person isn’t just a matter of opinion, and it’s not simply ‘disrespectful, discourteous, or insulting.’"

"Rather, it’s straight-up harassment,” the senator said.

“And, it erases an individual’s fundamental humanity, particularly one as vulnerable as a trans senior in a nursing home. This misguided decision cannot be allowed to stand.”

[READ MORE] Straight People Are Rejecting Transgenders: Activists Demand Government Intervenes

Share this post:
tags: LGBTQ | Transgender
Steve Quayle Neon Nettle telegram

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

NOTICE: It has come to our attention that our commenting platform provider - OpenWeb - has started targetting communities like ours in an attempt to silence conservative voices. Neon Nettle will not stand for this direct attack on the First Amendment. To counter this, we will no longer work with OpenWeb and have reverted to using Disqus for comments. Unfortunately, we may lose old conversations and you may need to sign up for a new account before you can leave a comment.

 

Subscribe to our mailing list

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT