New York Times Admits Anti-Trump 'Steele Dossier' Was Fake
Newspaper finally acknowledges that dossier was 'false' propaganda
© press
The New York Times has finally gone on record to admit that the infamous "Steele Dossier" was a fabricated piece of propaganda that was designed to smear President Donald Trump.
The NY Times was a major promoter of the now-debunked conspiracy theory that President Trump colluded with Russia to win the election in 2016.
The "Steele Dossier," which contained outlandish and salacious claims about President Trump, was a key feature in the Russian collusion narrative being peddled by the liberal media.
The document was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
Investigators turned up evidence that the "dossier" was, in fact, an opposition-research project funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Ironically, it later emerged that the document was based largely on Russian propaganda that was fed to Steele by a single source.
© press
Now, the Times has published a feature by former Times investigative report Barry Meier acknowledging many of the claims in the dossier "have never materialized or have been proved false."
Meier said he knocked on the door of Steele's home in Farnham, England, in his research of a book on the business of private intelligence, according to WND.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, he recalled, Steele had been hired by an investigative firm called Fusion GPS "to gather dirt about Donald J. Trump and Russia."
At that time, Meier wrote, those "involved with the dossier were intent on controlling its narrative and eager to capitalize on their fame."
Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, the founders of Fusion GPS, wrote a best-selling book about the dossier that became a best seller.
Steele sold his life rights to a Hollywood studio owned by George Clooney.
But the glow has faded, he said, noting the collapse of the dossier’s "most explosive claims — like a salacious 'pee' tape featuring Mr. Trump or a supposed meeting in Prague between Michael Cohen, Mr. Trump’s former attorney, and Russian operatives."
The dossier, he said, went on a "journey from media obsession to slush pile."
In January, documents declassified by the Trump administration showed Steele was introduced to his primary source by none other than Fiona Hill, the former Russia expert on the National Security Council who testified against President Trump in the first impeachment hearings.
Just the News editor John Solomon reported at the time that the documents showed the collusion narrative was created and leaked to the news media to "neutralize Hillary Clinton's concern that her email scandal had not yet gone away."
"It was actually a calculated political act, and you'll see in Christopher Steele's own acknowledgment that that was the reason that James Comey's continued actions to keep the case open drove him to leak and to plant what turned out to be a false story," he said.
The Obama FBI and Justice Department used the dossier as primary evidence to obtain warrants to spy on Trump volunteer adviser Carter Page.
© press
A report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz found intelligence agencies had warned the FBI that the document contained Kremlin disinformation.
In July 2020, The Washington Times noted the New York Times, "a prime peddler of a Trump-Russia election conspiracy narrative that was ultimately debunked, turned the Danchenko revelation into an anti-White House story."
The New York Times headline was "The F.B.I. Pledged to Keep a Source Anonymous. Trump Allies Aided His Unmasking."
But in a March 2017 interview with the FBI, Danchenko said his sub-sources' information was not worth "a grain of salt."
The FBI, nevertheless, continued to use the dossier to advance its Trump-Russia probe.
