McConnell Secures Enough Support to Confirm Supreme Court Nomination
Statements from Grassley and Gardner give Republicans required numbers
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has secured enough support for Republicans to vote to confirm President Donald Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court before the November election.
Several Republican senators made statements of support on Monday, giving McConnell the required numbers to move forward in the Senate.
Democrats were hopeful that enough moderates would break from the party line in order to block the GOP's effort to fill the SCOTUS seat left vacant after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
In a Monday statement, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa said that he will not stand in the way of another nomination by President Trump.
"Over the years, and as recently as July, I've consistently said that taking up and evaluating a nominee in 2020 would be a decision for the current chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the Senate Majority Leader," Grassley said in the statement.
"Both have confirmed their intentions to move forward, so that's what will happen," Grassley continued.
"Once the hearings are underway, it's my responsibility to evaluate the nominee on the merits, just as I always have.
"The Constitution gives the Senate that authority, and the American people's voices in the most recent election couldn't be clearer," he said.
"While there was ambiguity about the American people's will for the direction of the Supreme Court in 2016 under a divided government, there is no such ambiguity in 2020," Grassley added.
Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, informed members of the committee on Saturday that he would hold confirmation hearings for the nomination, according to The Blaze.
'Senate must decide how to best fulfill its constitutional duty'
Republican Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado also said that he would not stand in the way of a nomination.
"When a president exercises constitutional authority to nominate a judge for the Supreme Court vacancy, the Senate must decide how to best fulfill its constitutional duty of advice and consent," Gardner said.
"I have and will continue to support judicial nominees who will protect our Constitution, not legislate from the bench, and uphold the law," he concluded.
"Should a qualified nominee who meets this criteria be put forward, I will vote to confirm."
A heated debate
Democrats have argued that if Republicans were to push a nomination that it would be hypocritical because of McConnell's refusal to consider former President Barack Obama's nomination so close to the 2016 election.
Republicans have countered that the history of nominations to the Supreme Court offers precedence for senators of the same party as the president to have the mandate from the people to move forward on a nomination.
"[M]ake no mistake: if the shoe were on the other foot, Senate Democrats wouldn't hesitate to use their Constitutional authority and anything else at their disposal to fill this seat," Grassley said.
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) has not made a statement about his position in the debate, but if no other Republicans go against the party line, a tie in the Senate would lead to a tiebreaker vote from Vice President Mike Pence.