McEnany Crushes Reporter Who Asks How Many 'Dead Americans' Voters 'Should Tolerate'
Politico's Ryan Lizza gets nuked for pushing anti-Trump questions at White House presser

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany crushed an anti-Trump reporter during a presser this week.
Firebrand McEnany humiliated Politico's Ryan Lizza as he attempted to push anti-Trump questions during a Wednesday White House press briefing.
Lizza tried to force President Donald Trump into a corner by attempting to push McEnany into offering a number of “dead Americans” that voters “should tolerate” when they “go to the polls in November.”
After McEnany gave an answer, Lizza foolishly tried to press the matter by repeating the question, to which she responded by flattening him.
"I answered your question once, but if you ask it twice it doesn’t make it any better of a question," the press secretary asserted.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO

“Dr. (Deborah) Birx said it best when she said that in their estimates they had anywhere between 1.5 and 2 million people in the U.S. succumbing to the virus if we didn’t shut down the economy,” McEnany pointed out as she continued.
“Closing down the economy for this amount of time kept us far below the 2.2 million number.”
Lizza provoked McEnany’s response by asking:
“What does the White House view, as having by Election Day, what does the White House view as the number of dead Americans where you can say that you successfully defeated this pandemic? Is there a number?”
McEnany replied:
Yeah, you know, every loss of life counts. We say 100,000, but like the president says, one death is something to be mourned.
These 100,000 individuals have a face; the president takes this very seriously; it’s why he lowered the flag to half-staff for three days to remember these men and women.
I think Dr. Birx said it best when she said that in their estimates they had anywhere between 1.5 and 2 million people in the U.S. succumbing to the virus if we didn’t shut down the economy.
The president made the very hard choice of shutting down the economy so we avoided that extraordinary number.
One death is too many; we never want to see a single individual lose their life, but that being said, to be under significantly that high mark shows that the president did everything in his power and help to make this number as low as humanly possible.
"When voters go to the polls in November," Lizza repeated, "and they want to judge the president on his response to this pandemic, what is the number of dead Americans that they should tolerate where they can argue that yes, he successfully defeated the pandemic?”
"I think you’re asking the wrong question," McEnany fired back.
"The right question is where did the data —”
Lizza rudely interrupted, triggering McEnany to say bluntly, “I answered your question once, but if you ask it twice it doesn’t make it any better of a question so I’ll respond in kind.
"I’ve given you one answer; I’ll continue to extrapolate upon that, that he always listened to the science."

"The president, when Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx said, ‘You need to shut down the economy,’ that was hard for the president," she revealed.
"You know, in a typical year, 120,000 people die of suicide and drug overdose.
"That’s in a typical year. And doctors have said when you shut down an economy for an extended period of time that number gets greater.
"People don’t show up for their cancer diagnoses.
"There are a litany of results when you close down an economy, but closing down the economy for this amount of time kept us far below the 2.2 million number.
"As we start to reopen we keep in mind the people who are missing their screening appointments; the people who are succumbing to suicide and drug overdose because of economic hardship.”
"This president made the right choice; it was a delicate balance and he did it as exactly as he should guided by data, and we are far below 2.2 million dead Americans because of the actions of President Trump," McEnany concluded.
A reporter just repeatedly asked how many "dead Americans" we should "tolerate"?
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) May 26, 2020
@PressSec rightly points out how stupid of a question this is. pic.twitter.com/1pJltHUDO6