Democrat Wisconsin Gov Shot Down by Supreme Court for Overstepping Authority
Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ administration went too far with lockdown order, court rules
© press
Democratic Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers has been struck down by the Supreme Court after it ruled his administration overstepped its authority with the state's draconian lockdown order.
Wisconsin’s “safer at home” order was shot down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
The court ruled that Gov. Evers’ administration went too far when it extended the lockdown order through to the end of May.
Evers’ stay at home order was struck down by the court in a 4-3 decision, according to News Thud.
The case was brought forth by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the order issued last month by Andrea Palm, Evers’ top health secretary.
The ruling states that all future lockdown orders must now go through the legislature.
© press
The court denied a request from Republicans for a six-day stay, instead, striking down the order immediately, according to Fox News.
Evers issued a stay-at-home order in March which was supposed to expire April 24.
But the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Andrea Palm, an Evers appointee, extended it to May 26.
Republicans asked the Supreme Court on April 21 to block the extension, arguing that it amounts to an administrative rule, which requires legislative approval.
Evers’ administration argued that state law clearly gives the executive branch broad authority to enact emergency measures to control communicable diseases.
Attorney General Josh Kaul also noted that Evers' order was similar to that in at least 42 other states and has saved many lives.
Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote for the majority that the order equates to an emergency rule that Palm can't enact unilaterally.
The order creates criminal penalties that Palm has no authority to create, she added.
“Rule-making exists precisely to ensure that kind of controlling, subjective judgment asserted by one unelected official, Palm, is not imposed in Wisconsin,” Roggensack wrote for the majority.
© press
During oral arguments last week, Justice Rebecca Bradley suggested Palm’s decision to extend the order without legislative input amounts to tyranny, according to WKOW.
"I think there is a problem with the legislature giving away this much power to an un-elected cabinet secretary," said Bradley.
"The people never consented to a single individual having that kind of power."
Rebecca Dallet, a liberal dissenting Supreme Court justice, wrote that the court's decision will “undoubtedly go down as one of the most blatant examples of judicial activism in this court's history. And it will be Wisconsinites who pay the price."
The high court also backed Republicans over the liberal governor holding in-person voting in April for the presidential primary amid coronavirus.
Wisconsin has faced 10,902 cases of coronavirus and 421 deaths.
Deaths have been in the single digits for 9 of the last 14 days.
