Why Liberal California is Now the Poverty Capital of America

© press

Federal data released this month shows that liberal California has the highest poverty rate in the United States.

California's poverty rate is now at 19 percent, according to data from the Census Bureau's Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) for 2017.

That figure is down slightly by 1.4 percent from last year, but still the highest of any state in the country.

The policy director at the Public Policy Institute of California, Caroline Danielson, says that the high cost of living, particularly for housing, has weighed the socialist state down.

Still, the 1.4 percent drop isn't unique to California as it's consistent with national trends which saw the poverty rate for the entire country drop from 12.7 percent last year to 12.3 percent.

© press

According to Western Journal, America’s poverty capital is a state that’s had a history of wealth, both in terms of human capital and natural resources.

It’s where several of our biggest industries — including defense and tech — have been based.

It was a place where many people went in the 20th century to seek their fortunes.

And yet, after the state turned into the most liberal — dare we say socialist? — place in America, it also became our country’s epicenter of economic misery.

“California — not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia — has the highest poverty rate in the United States,” the Los Angeles Times notes in a Jan. 14 piece by Kerry Jackson.

“According to the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure –which accounts for the cost of housing, food, utilities, and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a form of income — nearly one out of four Californians is poor.”

So, why are Californians so poor?

After all, job and GDP growth is good, although most of that is based around the tech sector.

Part of it, Jackson argues, is that “state and local bureaucracies that implement California’s antipoverty programs … resisted pro-work reforms” that began in the 1990s to get people off of welfare.

“It’s not as if California policymakers have neglected to wage war on poverty, Sacramento and local governments have spent massive amounts in the cause, for decades now.

"Myriad state and municipal benefit programs overlap with one another; in some cases, individuals with incomes 200 percent above the poverty line receive benefits, according to the California Policy Center,” Jackson writes.

“Unfortunately, California, with 12 percent of the American population, is home today to roughly one in three of the nation’s welfare recipients.

"The generous spending, then, has not only failed to decrease poverty; it actually seems to have made it worse,” Jackson continued.

“According to the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure –which accounts for the cost of housing, food, utilities, and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a form of income — nearly one out of four Californians is poor.”

© press

So, why are Californians so poor? After all, job and GDP growth is good, although most of that is based around the tech sector.

Part of it, Jackson argues, is that “state and local bureaucracies that implement California’s antipoverty programs … resisted pro-work reforms” that began in the 1990s to get people off of welfare.

“It’s not as if California policymakers have neglected to wage war on poverty, Sacramento and local governments have spent massive amounts in the cause, for decades now.

"Myriad state and municipal benefit programs overlap with one another; in some cases, individuals with incomes 200 percent above the poverty line receive benefits, according to the California Policy Center,” Jackson writes.

“Unfortunately, California, with 12 percent of the American population, is home today to roughly one in three of the nation’s welfare recipients.

"The generous spending, then, has not only failed to decrease poverty; it actually seems to have made it worse,” Jackson continued.

© press

That’s not the only place where the state’s exigent environmental regulations have hurt the middle class and poor.

Some estimates have energy prices at 50 percent more than the national average due mostly to regulations.

“In 2012, nearly 1 million California households faced ‘energy poverty’ — defined as energy expenditures exceeding 10 percent of household income.

"In certain California counties, the rate of energy poverty was as high as 15 percent of all households,” read a 2015 Manhattan Institute study titled “Less Carbon, Higher Prices” authored by Jonathan A. Lesser.

© press

And things are only poised to get worse: “By 2020, California will require that one-third of electricity consumed in the state be generated from renewable sources,” the study read.

“California households’ electricity prices have risen as a result of the state’s renewable-energy mandates and carbon cap-and-trade program — and will likely continue to rise at an even faster rate in coming years.”

The great irony at work here is that this has been the Democrat playbook for decades now.

We’re told that if we give the poorest among us welfare, it will spark the economy more than tax cuts because the impoverished will put that money back into the economy.

Green energy — adopted in expedited fashion due to environmental regulations — was supposed to create new industries and economic growth as far as the windmill-trained eye could see.

Instead, what we’ve seen is homelessness, shantytowns, extreme income inequality, joblessness, deficits, and all without discernible benefit to the state and the nation at large.

Which raises the question: isn’t this what they said the conservative agenda would lead to?