Neon Nettle
© 2019 Neon Nettle

Subscribe to our mailing list

Advertise Contact About Us Our Writers T&C's Privacy Support Us © 2019 Neon Nettle All Rights Reserved.

9/11: Plane Distress Signals Show They Crashed BEFORE Hitting WTC

Flights 11 and 175's radio distress signals went off before impact

 on 18th July 2018 @ 9.00pm
flights 11 and 175 s radio distress signals went off before impact © press
Flights 11 and 175's radio distress signals went off before impact

Newley discovered 9/11 evidence has revealed that both Flights 11 and 175's radio distress signals went off before they actually crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

The emergency locator transmitters (ELTs), which are intended to aid locate crashed aircraft by use of distress signals, were activated over two minutes before the American Airlines Flight 11 hit the north WTC tower.

The transmitters were activated four minutes before United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower.

David Bottiglia, an air traffic controller at the FAA's New York Center, said he received an important message from one of the planes in the airspace he was monitoring.

At 8:44 a.m., the pilot of U.S. Airways Flight 583 told Bottiglia:

"I just picked up an ELT on 121.5. It was brief, but it went off." (121.5 megahertz is an emergency frequency that ELTs are designed to transmit their distress signals on.)

A minute later The pilot of Delta Airlines Flight 2433 told Bottiglia:

"We picked up that ELT, too. But it's very faint." [2] According to author Lynn Spencer, "several" facilities picked up the ELT signal around this time. [3]

Traffic management coordinator at the New York Center, Peter McCloskey, claimed that the ELT had gone off "in the vicinity of Lower Manhattan."

9 11  plane distress signals show they crashed before hitting wtc © press

According to shoestring911: And, around the time Flight 11 hit the WTC, a participant in an FAA teleconference stated, "We got a report of an ELT in the area that [the radar track for Flight 11] was in."

(Before it disappeared from radar screens, the track for Flight 11 had indicated the plane was about 20 miles from New York's JFK International Airport.)

However, while an ELT went off minutes before Flight 11 hit the WTC, it appears that no ELT went off at the time of the crash itself.

EMERGENCY TRANSMITTER WENT OFF OVER FOUR MINUTES BEFORE FLIGHT 175 CRASHED

United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center at 9:03 a.m. and 11 seconds. [6] But, as with the first crash, an ELT was activated in the New York area several minutes before this plane hit the tower.

At just before 8:59 a.m., over four minutes before the Flight 175 crash, the pilot of Flight 583, who had reported the ELT signal before the North Tower was struck, told David Bottiglia at the New York Center that he had noticed another ELT going off.

The pilot said, "I hate to keep burdening you with this stuff, but now we're picking up another ELT on 21.5." [7]

As with the previous crash, although an ELT went off minutes before Flight 175 hit the South Tower, it seems that no ELT went off at the time of the crash itself.

ELT SHOULD ONLY GO OFF IN EVENT OF A CRASH

An emergency locator transmitter is a battery-operated radio transmitter carried by aircraft, which can emit a distinctive signal on the emergency frequencies of 121.5 and 243.0 megahertz.

When "armed," an ELT is designed to automatically activate in the event of a crash and then continually emit the emergency signal, thereby helping rescuers to locate the crashed aircraft. 

ELTs are required to be installed in almost all U.S.-registered civil aircraft.

Paul Thumser, an operations supervisor at the FAA's New York Center on 9/11, has over 20 years' experience as an air traffic controller and is also an experienced airline pilot.

He provided the 9/11 Commission with detailed information about ELTs. Thumser said the ELT in a Boeing 767--the type of plane that hit both of the WTC towers--cannot be activated by a pilot.

Therefore, with a 767, "impact would be the only way to trigger one."

Furthermore, the sensitivity setting of the ELT in a 767 "is not low," and so it should be impossible for one to be set off by the plane making a hard turn or a hard landing.

Thumser, therefore, judged that "it would have to be a serious impact to set the ELT off." [10] Terry Biggio, the operations manager at the FAA's Boston Center, similarly told the 9/11 Commission:

"An ELT is not a signal sent by pilot operators. It is clearly indicative of a crash." 

9 11  plane distress signals show they crashed before hitting wtc © press

This means that an ELT should not have been activated over two minutes before Flight 11 hit the North Tower, nor should one have been activated over four minutes before Flight 175 hit the South Tower.

If such transmitters on Flights 11 and 175 had been set off, this should have happened when these planes struck the WTC, and yet that did not happen.

It was perhaps for this reason that Mike McCormick, the air traffic control manager at the FAA's New York Center, told the 9/11 Commission that his "best hypothesis" was that the ELT signal transmitted "moments before the impact of AA 11" was "unrelated to the event" of the crash.

McCormick also told the 9/11 Commission that ELT signals sometimes "happened accidentally," and that "the vast majority are false alarms."

However, this could not have been the case with the signals before the WTC crashes. None of the air traffic controllers who were involved with monitoring Flights 11 and 175 have reported any planes' ELTs going off by accident around that time.

And for one plane in the New York area to have its ELT set off accidentally just before Flight 11 hit the WTC, and then the ELT on another plane in that area going off accidentally just before Flight 175 hit the WTC, would have been too big a coincidence to be plausible.

INEXPLICABLE EVIDENCE

The strange evidence of emergency locator transmitter signals being broadcast in the New York area before the World Trade Center towers were hit raises serious questions about the official account of the 9/11 attacks.

According to that account, if ELTs had been activated, this should have been at the times the planes hit the towers, not several minutes beforehand. 

The evidence appears inexplicable, and so proper investigation is imperative to make sense of it.

But while a number of air traffic controllers mentioned the ELT signals in their interviews with the 9/11 Commission, the 9/11 Commission Report offered no explanation for this anomalous evidence.

Many questions remain unanswered. For example, were the sources of the ELT signals ever determined?

If so, did the signals indeed come from the planes that hit the WTC, or were they from somewhere else? And were the transmitters themselves ever found?

After all, according to the FAA, "In most installations the [ELT] is attached to the aircraft structure as far aft as practicable in the fuselage; or in the tail surface, in such a manner that damage to the beacon will be minimized in the event of a crash impact."

So the transmitters should have survived the crashes, if they were in the planes that hit the Twin Towers.

If the ELTs were found, then, were they indeed in the rubble of the World Trade Center? Or were they somewhere else?

Share this post:
tags: 911 | Conspiracy

Facebook is heavily censoring information from independent sources.

To bypass internet censorship, connect with us directly by enabling our notifications (using the red subscription bell in the bottom right corner) or by subscribing to our free daily newsletter.

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox for free every day by signing up below.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Whatfinger banner
Vote Now

Follow Neon Nettle


PREV
BOOKMARK US
NEXT