More Doctors Confessing To Misdiagnosing Healthy People With Cancer For Money
GP's have been misrepresenting their oaths by giving cancer misdiagnoses
More doctors who have deliverance diagnosed otherwise healthy patients with cancer in order to make money are being caught by authorities.
GP's have been misrepresenting their oaths by giving cancer misdiagnoses to healthy patients so they can make money from prescribing poisonous chemotherapy.
Since Big Pharma is using terminal illnesses to fund a massive cancer drug industry, its no wonder why fraudulent doctors would see this as an opportunity.
Just one example is Dr. Farid Fata, a well-known cancer doctor in Michigan who admitted to the court to deliberately diagnosing healthy people with cancer.
Fata gave his healthy patient's chemotherapy drugs in order to make money for himself.
The most sickening thing is, nearly all doctors can make money and commissions based on the volume of patients treated with specific pharmaceuticals, cancer drugs being the most lucrative.
“Many of these unscrupulous Physicians are like businessmen without a conscience. The only difference is they have your health and trust in their hands–a very dangerous combination when money is involved,” said Dr. Sayed Mohammed, a retired Oncologist who saw the trend more 10 years ago
This is what Dr. Fata said in court in his guilty plea:
“It is my choice,”
“I knew that it was medically unnecessary.”
Fata ran a $35-million Medicare fraud scheme that involved diagnosing healthy people with cancer and ruining countless lives in order to make a profit.
The government states Fata ran the plan from 2009 to today, through his medical organizations, consisting of Michigan Hematology Oncology Centers, with offices in Clarkston, Bloomfield Hills, Lapeer, Sterling Heights, Troy and Oak Park.
According to the federal government, Fata had a patient load of 1,200 people and received $62 million from Medicare; he billed for more than $150 million.
U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said she prepares to look for life in prison for Fata, calling his case is "the most outright" health care scams case her workplace has seen.
She stated Fata not just bilked the government-- which is common in such cases-, but he likewise damaged clients.
Lying with Statistics
Prostate cancer is another terrific example which doctors wrongly offer diagnoses about without providing clients the realities.
A prostate (PSA) blood test tries to find prostate-specific antigen, a protein produced by the prostate gland.
High levels are supposedly related to prostate cancer.
The issue is that the association isn't always correct when it is, the prostate cancer isn't still fatal.
Only about 3 percent of all males pass away from prostate cancer. The PSA test typically results in overdiagnosis, biopsies and treatment in which the negative effects are impotence and incontinence.
Repetitive biopsies might spread out cancer cells into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling malignant cells straight into the bloodstream or lymphatic system.
More than 90% of Doctors who motivate cancer treatment for prostate cancer will create a commission from each therapy the client gets.
It shows dangerous and often lethal in the long run for many people who don't comprehend the best ways to take care of their health and are encouraged by incorrect stats.
Lots of excellent big studies have actually been done on men who have actually had cancer found in their prostate with a biopsy.
In over 97% of the cases this cancer either never ever spreads out outside of the gland to cause harm or the client dies of something else long prior to any proof of cancer spreading outside of the prostate takes place.
Because 3% where cancer is aggressive and hurts the client, it has actually currently spread beyond the limits of surgical resection long previously discovery; thus, these men are not helped by surgical treatment either.
After a minimum of seven years of post-college graduate medical education on the psychological, mental, and physical condition of the person, you would expect a doctor to be a powerhouse of goodwill for his/her clients.
Sadly, too many physicians fail to keep the well-being of their consumers at the leading edge, as their primary issue.
The needs to improve their egos, self-preservation, and the mission for more money often lead to improper care and harm to the client.
Many women are typically informed that hysterectomies lead to various treatments for cancer and other disorders. This is misrepresenting the reality.
The research study done so far has actually shown no improvement in survival no matter the aggressiveness of many of these unnecessary treatments.
Breast cancer screenings also lead to an increase in breast cancer mortality and fail to address prevention.
Regardless of no proof ever having actually supported any recommendations made for routine periodic screening and mammography at any age, malicious recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) on breast cancer screening are now suggesting that breast cancer screening should start at age 40 and earlier in high-risk patients.
Released in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR), the recommendations released by the SBI and ACR state that the average client ought to start yearly breast cancer screening at age 40.
They also target females in their 30s if they are considered "high danger" as they specified.
The rate of advanced breast cancer for U.S. ladies 25 to 39 years of ages nearly doubled from 1976 to 2009, a difference too great to be a matter of chance and more about diagnoses.
A troubling study released in the New England Journal of Medicine is bringing mainstream focus on that mammography has triggered even more damage than great in the countless women who have actually employed it over the past 30 years as their primary strategy in the battle against breast cancer.
It always has actually been and still will have to do with the cash. Is it not time to acknowledge the trend?
Chemotherapy Does Not Heal The Body, It Slowly Destroys It
Chemotherapy boosts cancer development and long-term death rates. Most chemotherapy patients either die or are afflicted with the disease within 10-15 years after treatment.
It ruins their immune system, increases neuro-cognitive decrease, interrupts endocrine working and triggers organ and metabolic toxicities.
Clients live in an irreversible state of the disease until their death.
The cancer market marginalizes safe and effective cures while promoting their patented, expensive, and harmful solutions whose dangers far exceed any benefit. This is exactly what they do best, and they do it because it generates income, plain and simple.
The factor a 5-year relative survival rate is the basis used to evaluate mortality rates is because of most cancer patients going downhill after this period.
It's awful for an organization and the cancer industry understands it.
They might never reveal the public the true 97% analytical failure rate in dealing with long-term metastatic cancers.
If they did publish the long-lasting data for all cancers administered cytotoxic chemotherapy, that is 10+ years and produced the objective data on strenuous assessments including the cost-effectiveness, influence on the immune system, quality of life, morbidity and death, it would be very clear to the world that chemotherapy makes little to no contribution to cancer survival at all. No such research study has ever been carried out by independent detectives in the history of chemotherapy.
The only studies offered originated from market funded institutions and scientists and none of them have ever inclusively quantified the above variables.
Why? Loan, greed, and profits run the cancer industry-- absolutely nothing else. The cancer establishment must pull back from the truth to treat cancer because there will never be any earnings for them in removing the illness.
There is no governing body worldwide that protects consumers from being subjected to these hazardous therapies and even known carcinogens in our foods our environment, since that too, will avoid the profits from rolling in.
It's a business of mammoth proportions and must be dealt with as such. The most potent anti-carcinogenic plants on the planet such as marijuana need to be demonized and be made prohibited because they are so effective at killing cancer cells without adverse effects.
Cannabinoids are so effective at treating disease, that the United States Government patented them in 2003.
If a "magic bullet" were utilized FIRST by orthodox medicine, indicating the cut/burn/slash/ poison treatments were avoided, a 90% true remedy rate would be simple to accomplish.
But the truth is that the leaders in the medical community have absolutely no interest in discovering a "magic bullet."
A "magic bullet" would cost the drug business numerous billions of dollars, and clients would have less hospitalization and less physician sees, etc
You might ask your oncologist why your possibilities of survival are only 3% (overlooking all their statistical gibberish such as "5-year survival rates" and misleading terms like "remission" and "reaction"), when your opportunity of survival would be over 90% if they used something like GcMaf