George Orwell: 'History Stopped in 1936, Everything Since is Just Propaganda'
Prophetical author discussing manipulation of historical events
Arguably one of the greatest writers of the 20th century, George Orwell often described a dystopian future that has eerily evolved into the reality of our present day.
His most famous work, 1984, imagined a world where people were controlled by a totalitarian new world order, that enslaved its people through screens that funneled propaganda into the consciousness of every citizen.
Perhaps, in the modern world, it would be easy to dream up such a narrative, but Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four was first published in 1949.
His commentary was so frighteningly accurate, that many assume he somehow had foreknowledge of the future, enabling him to accurately predict the contemporary world as a largely simulated reality conditioned by technology and mass media.
Aside from 1984, George Orwell sounded the warning bell of modern man’s mainstream media enslavement, decades ago, when he said, "History stopped in 1936."
It was written as a reflection on Orwell’s participation in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), in which he fought for the Republican side against the Franco-led fascists.
According to Orwell, it was during the Spanish War that he became aware of the pervasive use of propaganda used to support the modern totalitarian regimes.
“I remember saying once to Arthur Koestler, ‘History stopped in 1936’, at which he nodded in immediate understanding. We were both thinking of totalitarianism in general, but more particularly of the Spanish civil war. Early in life I have noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as the heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines’.”
Orwell’s above observations were inspired by the World War II era when totalitarian regimes such as Nazi Germany and Communist Russia constituted a threat to freedom in the world.
But since then, a number of thinkers have remarked that America and other Western countries are devolving into a “soft totalitarianism,” in which a pleasure-loving and increasingly lonely populace surrenders their freedoms to radical ideologies, which maintain their hold through education and a steady stream of propaganda.
As a result of the modern world’s reliance on propaganda, Orwell recognized that our access to the truth of past events—such as the Spanish Civil War or World War II—would be severely compromised:
“This kind of thing is frightening to me, because it often gives me the feeling that the very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. After all, the chances are that those lies, or at any rate similar lies, will pass into history… Yet, after all, some kind of history will be written, and after those who actually remember the war are dead, it will be universally accepted. So for all practical purposes the lie will have become the truth.”
Orwell was not naive about history.
He noted it was “the fashion” to suggest that history was essentially a long list of lies and recognized the likelihood that many writers of history “deliberately lied ... or unconsciously colored what they wrote.”
“But what is peculiar to our own age,” Orwell wrote, “is the abandonment of the idea that history could be truthfully written”; that there is a “body... of neutral fact on which neither [historian] would seriously challenge the other.”
If true, Orwell's reflections lead to some frightening conclusions.
Namely, that the propaganda of the past is now our “history,” that the propaganda we see in the news today will one day be studied by future generations as “truth,” and that reality stretches ever further beyond our grasp in an age of relativism and mass media.